McIvor Reserve Master Plan
Update: 18 April 2023
Council will be proceeding with the implementation of a Master Plan to deliver multi-million dollar improvements, including an indoor sports facility, at McIvor Reserve in Yarraville - after a bid to overturn the original decision failed.
The motion was lost four-three. This means the decision made at the meeting on 29 March to endorse the document, stands.The Master Plan includes additional actions and revisions addressing specific concerns raised during engagement. It was informed by more than ten months of engagement with the community, sporting clubs, and users of the Reserve, technical investigations, and specialist advice.
It also confirms the inclusion of an indoor sports facility as part of a balanced outcome that responds to a variety of community needs.
You can view the endorsed Master Plan here.
FAQs
Master Plan Process
Indoor Sports Facility
- Why will an indoor sports facility be placed at McIvor Reserve?
- Are there no other options?
- Why didn't you look at a brownfields site?
Reducing Open Space
FAQs
Master Plan Process
- Why does McIvor Reserve need a Master Plan?
McIvor Reserve is a municipal recreational space, catering for a variety of sporting and recreational needs for residents across the City.
A Master Plan articulates the upgrades required to ensure it remains an inviting and flexible space that continues to meet the needs of our fast-growing community.
Indoor Sports Facility
- Why will an indoor sports facility be placed at McIvor Reserve?
In 2018, the Maribyrnong Indoor Sports Stadium Strategy highlighted a shortfall in indoor courts to meet the growing demand of a number of sporting codes over the next 20 years, with a need for between 12-20 courts by 2036.
McIvor Reserve presents a viable opportunity to support the immediate need for a six-court facility in the south-west of our municipality that will enable sporting clubs and associations to train and compete locally.
- Are there no other options?
Robert Barrett Reserve will be explored as a potential site in the north of the City, however this would not be in place of McIvor Reserve, as multiple facilities and locations are required to service the needs of the community more broadly.
- Why didn't you look at a brownfields site?
Council doesn’t own any brownfields sites that could accommodate an indoor sports facility and there are no suitable sites currently available for us to investigate. The financial implications would also have to be considered.
Reducing Open Space
- What percentage of open space does Maribyrnong have?
Of the total municipal area of 3,125 hectares, a 2017 report recorded 11.2% as public open space, which equated at that time to 41.8 square metres per person. This was also slightly higher than the average Melbourne metropolitan figure of 9%.
This is not the lowest percentage of open space in Victoria with the Victorian Planning Authorities Metropolitan Open Space Network Distribution Report - June 2017 identifying 20 local authorities from 32 surveyed with less open space provision than Maribyrnong.
You can find the details at Open-Space-Network-Provision-and-Distribution-Reduced-Size.pdf (vpa.vic.gov.au) See Table 5 for a breakdown.
Council’s Open Space Strategy 2014 also identifies 24 individual areas covering 70.98 hectares in Yarraville or 13% of the total area of the precinct. This equates to 44.81 square metres of open space per person based on the 2021 population of 15,840. This is in excess of the average provision of 20-25 square metres outlined in various planning models. Even with expected population growth to 21,688 in 2051 this would be 32.73 square metres per person, before taking into account new open space at Birmingham Street with the Bradmill development, and any other opportunities that may arise.
Council remains committed to seeking opportunities to increase provision generally.
- Does this Master Plan reduce access to open space in this neighbourhood?
Council is not reducing access to open space at McIvor Reserve – indeed the Bradmill development provides for direct access to McIvor Reserve for new residents as well as existing residents to enjoy open space in the surrounding area.
The endorsed Master Plan also includes a new McIvor Road (running north to south along the western boundary of the Reserve) – to improve vehicular access – and a shared path network from the signalised intersection in the north western corner of the Reserve to Fogarty Avenue and the Federation Trail in the south-eastern corner – to encourage more cyclists and pedestrians to navigate to and through the Reserve.
Council also continues to advocate for improved public transport connections to the area.
Engagement Process
- Has Council’s engagement process been genuine and authentic?
In line with Council’s Community Engagement Policy, engagement was genuine, authentic and in line with best practice with two opportunities for the community to engage and participate in the process over a ten month period from April 2022 to January 2023. Council also directly engaged with recreational users and sporting clubs who call the Reserve home, as part of the master planning process.
Feedback from phase one helped inform the draft Master Plan, which was shared with the community for feedback in November 2022. Similarly, the second round of engagement has informed changes and revision to the draft document. The updated Master Plan was endorsed on 29 March 2023. Close on 2,000 individuals participated across both phases.
- Who was able to provide feedback as part of this project?
Council sought the views of directly impacted neighbours, residents and users and invited comment from other interested parties, recognising McIvor Reserve is a regional facility servicing the broader community, including some residents who live outside our borders.
During both engagement phases respondents were asked to share information on where they live. In both phases the vast majority (well over 85%) identified as residents of Maribyrnong.
Council also directly engaged with recreational users and sporting clubs who call the Reserve home, as part of the master planning process.
Funding
- How is Council proposing to fund the implementation of the changes outlined in this Master Plan?
Council has publicly acknowledged it will be advocating for funding support from external parties, including State and Federal governments, recognising if all the elements in the updated Master Plan were to be implemented, the estimated cost would be in the order of $58 million.
A schematic and detailed design process will be undertaken before any major works could be undertaken.
Proposed Master Plan
- What changes and revisions have been made since the draft Master Plan was shared for feedback?
The endorsed Master Plan reflects technical investigations and specialist advice and includes additional actions and revisions addressing specific concerns raised during engagement.
Impact on trees:
- The estimated number of trees impacted as per the endorsed Master Plan is 114. This is 49 fewer than the draft Master Plan.
- For every tree removed, two will be replanted and where appropriate like for like, delivering a minimum net increase of 114 trees in the Reserve, with species to enhance habitat, climate suitability and canopy resilience.
Impact on the dog park:
- The impact on the existing dog park has been adjusted from 50% to 17.6% providing a dog park of approximately 7,500 square metres to be reconstructed and upgraded.
- An additional 6,000 square metres of open space outside the new outfield fence on the baseball field will be designated an off-dog lead area, with a new path, turf, landscaping, irrigation and drainage to make it more useable and accessible, to offset the 1600 square metres reduction in the existing dog park.
- Users will be engaged through design development around these upgrades.
Impact on traffic:
- A new signalised intersection and pedestrian crossing will be established at the intersection of Francis and Roberts streets and the new McIvor Road, which will be the main access point to the Reserve.
- A shared path network will also be created from the signalised intersection in the north-western corner to Fogarty Avenue and the Federation Trail in the south-eastern corner to encourage alternate modes of transport.
Impact on parking:
- Parking on the northern side of Benbow Street, and the proposed extension of the Hawkhurst Street car park have been removed from the proposed Master Plan.
- The connection between the soccer club and hockey club car park will be formalised, with no changes to parking adjacent to the existing policy.
Impact on amenities:
- The playground is staying in its current location so it is not separated from the open sports field area by a car park.
- More trees, park benches, and shade shelters will be provided.
Indoor sports facility:
- The endorsed Master Plan includes an indoor sports facility as part of a balanced outcome that responds to a variety of community needs.
- The building will be positioned partially on the existing Hawkhurst Street car park to minimise impact on green space, and the footprint has been reduced to remain outside the area leased to the Yarraville Footscray Bowling Club.
- Including the vehicle drop-off zone, the facility will occupy approximately 0.6 hectares of open space which represents 3.3% of the entire 18.5 hectares that makes up McIvor Reserve.
Other sports upgrades:
- The Yarraville Footscray Bowls Club will remain as a stand-alone entity, with no changes to the existing space.
- The baseball diamond also remains in its current location with upgrades to the playing field, dugouts, and scorer’s box.
- Floodlights at the hockey centre will be upgraded to senior competition standard, with minor changes to the location of the soccer goal storage.
Community Engagement Journey
Explore the tabs below to look back on the two formal phases of engagement.
Community Engagement Feedback Summary
We’ve provided a snapshot of the last ten months of community engagement on the McIvor Reserve Master Plan.
Phase two engagement occurred over a period of eight weeks from November 2022 to January 2023. This included a four week engagement period prior to Christmas and extended engagement over the holiday period to support those who may not have been able to provide feedback beforehand, to also share their comments.
Across all engagement activities a total of 4,017 comments were received from 753 respondents made up of:
- 394 surveys (from 351 contributors)
- 1,657 comments on the virtual post-it boards
- eight hard copy surveys
- 275 comments from 65 attendees at in-person sessions
- 22 pieces of written correspondence (from a mix of individuals and representatives of sporting groups and organisations on behalf of their several thousand members)
Many aspects of the draft Master Plan were well received, particularly the need for public toilets, more activation spaces (such as the outdoor gym and linear path), more lighting, shade, seating, and improved drainage for the dog park and sports fields.
There were general themes to minimise impact on green space and protection of trees, and a desire to better understand any impacts to parking and traffic potentially generated by the proposed additional use.
Overall much of the feedback centred around the support or otherwise for the inclusion of an Indoor Sports Facility on the Reserve.
There was a general acknowledgement of the need for a new Indoor Sports Facility within the municipality - but there are ongoing concerns around impacts on the local environment if one was to be built at McIvor Reserve.
Green space and tree loss along with the impact on the existing dog park were the main issues raised, with traffic and other concerns associated with an increased use of the Reserve specifically flagged by close neighbours during face-to-face sessions.
Conversely there were also comments expressing gratitude, relief and excitement at the release of the draft Master Plan and the propsect of including a six-idnoor sports facility, given the existing shortfall and growing pressure this is placing on clubs.
Phase two also allowed community members to share their ideas on the proposed changes at McIvor Reserve via virtual post-it boards. Links to the virtual post-it boards are below:
The draft Master Plan identified more than two dozen proposed upgrades to enhance the Reserve, reflecting community priorities as requested in the initial feedback.
It also outlined the key improvements and enhancements including:
- Improved access to public toilets
- Improved lighting - for general and recreational use
- More shade, seating, vegetation, and tree cover
- Enhancements to the existing dog park
- Improved and more accessible playspace and BBQ area
- Surface upgrades to the sports fields
- More parking to reduce overflow onto local roads
- More spaces to relax and enjoy the outdoors
The draft also provided greater clarity around what an indoor sports facility could look like if it was located on the Reserve. This included positioning, size, and associated impacts on open space, traffic, and parking.
You can view a copy of the draft Master Plan here.
Phase one engagement summary
Phase one engagement occurred over a period from late April to late June 2022. Feedback from phase one helped inform the draft Master Plan, which was shared with the community for feedback in November 2022.
You can view a summary of the phase one engagement findings here.
Questions and Answers - June 2022
In late June 2022, you provided 109 questions seeking additional information in relation to the need and potential siting of an indoor sports facility at McIvor Reserve. We answered these as best we could via the Q&A tool. We also collated the most common questions and answered received at the time in the tabs below.
Q: Why do we need an indoor sports facility?
A: In 2018, the Maribyrnong Indoor Sports Stadium Strategy highlighted the City of Maribyrnong was short between four and 12 indoor courts to meet growing demand for a range of sporting codes over the next 20 years. There are currently only two multi-court facilities providing unrestricted use to the broader community. With our population forecast to nearly double during this time, there is an immediate need for a four-six court facility to ensure indoor sporting clubs and associations are able to train and compete locally.
Q: How big would an indoor sports facility be?
A: At this stage, Council is exploring options for a six-court multi-use facility and associated amenities i.e. changing rooms and parking. The actual footprint would be dependent on a number of factors including site conditions, constraints and additional amenities that might be included such as a commercial café or flexible meeting rooms. The Maribyrnong Indoor Sports Stadium Strategy suggests such a facility could be anywhere from 5,000 – 10,000 square metres, but we won’t know this until a suitable site is identified and initial design work completed.
Q: What sites is Council looking at for an indoor sports facility?
A: The Maribyrnong Indoor Sports Stadium Strategy identified 11 possible locations for an indoor sports facility. For a variety of reasons, some are not possible and some are being investigated further – McIvor Reserve is one of them.
Q: Why can’t Council build an indoor sports facility on an old industrial site?
A: Council doesn’t own any industrial sites that could accommodate an indoor sports facility. We also don’t have large financial reserves to draw upon to fund such a purchase, if a suitable site was available.
Q: Why has Council budgeted to develop designs for an indoor facility if no site has been confirmed?
A: Council has allocated funding to support schematic design for a potential facility in the 2022-23 Budget. This will allow us to develop baseline costings to take advantage of any opportunities to apply for grants and external funding from the State or Federal Government.
Q: On what basis is McIvor Reserve being considered?
A: McIvor Reserve is a municipal reserve, on Council owned land, that attracts residents from across the City. It has been assessed against key selection criteria in the Indoor Sports Stadium Strategy as having the capacity to accommodate an indoor sports facility. This includes amongst other things; the size of the site, future expansion opportunity, topography, site services, access and traffic impacts and location to future population/catchments.
Q: Does this mean the fenced dog park is at risk?
A: There is no intention for the updated Master Plan not to include a dog park.
Q: What about land contamination – won’t this be an issue with a new building at the Reserve?
A: Contaminated land is an ongoing issue for Maribyrnong, given our significant history of heavy manufacturing and industry. Whatever site may be chosen for an indoor sports facility, a complete environmental assessment will be needed to ensure its suitability for use. Environmental management would also be required to manage any contamination that may be present
Q: What about increased traffic?
A: Whichever site is chosen for an indoor sports facility, traffic and parking issues will be a key consideration in the planning process. However, the proposed new road and cycling route connecting Fogarty Avenue and Francis St as part of the Bradmill site redevelopment could provide an opportunity to redirect traffic away from residential streets. Alternative access routes would also need to be considered in addition to Hawkhurst Street, Benbow Street and Wembley Avenue.
Q: How would an indoor sports facility on a Reserve align with Council’s commitment to open space?
A: Council recognises the value its community places on open space and is committed to maintaining and improving these spaces but it also has to balance the needs of its diverse community for a range of services. It will always seek, where it can, to ensure new developments do not infringe upon these spaces.
Q: But isn’t this just for show – haven’t you already made up your mind?
A: Not at all. Engagement is genuine and authentic and in line with best practice. We received more than 1100 responses via an online questionnaire, plus additional emails and letters, and have responded to more than 109 additional questions via the digital engagement portal after the engagement period closed. You can view these questions on right hand side of this page.
Council also directly engaged with approximately 70 recreational users and neighbours of the Reserve at face-to-face meetings on the Reserve, and sporting clubs who call the Reserve home as part of our engagement with the community, which has provided valuable information that will assist in informing master plan options and future developments at the site.
Q: Why didn’t you provide more details for us to consider?
A: We understand the idea of a proposed Indoor Sports Facility at McIvor Reserve has raised some questions we are unable to answer definitively given we are such an early stage of the Master Planning process. However please be assured should Council decide there is merit in exploring the idea further, we will provide further detailed information to the community.
Q: Will you share what you have heard?
A: Yes, we’ll be providing a comprehensive overview of the feedback received as a part of Phase 2 engagement but three findings from the survey we can share include:
What are the next steps?
A: Information and key findings gathered from the community as part of the Phase 1 engagement will inform development of the updated draft master plan which will be shared with the community for further feedback sometime in September/October this year. This engagement will be conducted in accordance with Council’s Community Engagement Policy.
After considering this additional feedback, Council will make further adjustments to the draft Master Plan as necessary, prior to considering the final Master Plan for adoption around December this year.
How can I stay involved?
A: To stay up to date and provide further feedback during the next engagement phase just hit the ‘follow’ button at the top of this page.
Questions and Answers
We're not accepting further questions but you can still view those previously asked along with the answers.
To ask a question you must create an account or log in.
These are the people that are listening and responding to your questions.
The community engagement team
Shari Liby asked | Question asked to The community engagement team
There are 25 questions on this page that were submitted over 10 days ago, to which no response has yet been received. I note your commitment in the Community Engagement Policy to "endeavour to provide information that is objective, relevant, TIMELY easy to access and to understand to meet our audience needs." Can you please answer these older questions urgently, and in the order received?
The community engagement team
Hi Shari,
Given the quantum of questions we have received (over 100), we are doing our very best to respond to questions in a timely manner.
Shari Liby asked
You told MPG "13% of those who responded to the questionnaire specifically identified as dog owners, which is also around 10% of the total number of registered dog owners in Yarraville." You have now told me that, "While we also know, from the recent questionnaire, that around 8% (142) respondents walk their dogs at the Reserve." First, can you please explain this discrepancy between 8% and 13%? Second, did you gather this information from responses to question 2, question 14, or both? Please explain your methodology.
The community engagement team
Hi Shari,
The difference is likely a result of different questions asked – one asked specifically if users identified as dog owners whilst the other asked how individuals use the reserve – ie to walk their dogs. We will share the final results in due course.
Shari Liby asked | Question asked to The community engagement team
I previously asked, "Do you agree that an indoor stadium does not cater to unstructured recreational needs at McIvor?" You responded that Council decision-making is guided by a number of individual but inter-connected strategies, that may not always be directly referenced in any particular document." You did not directly respond to the clear query however. Again, do you agree that an indoor stadium does not cater to unstructured recreational needs at McIvor?
The community engagement team
Hi Shari,
We have nothing further to add to the answers we have previously provided.
RosG asked | Question asked to The community engagement team
Will council please reconsider what they deem as local resident views. Our family lives in Kingsville. Because of where McIvor Reverse is situated in the municipality we are a kilometre closer to the Reverse than say Yarraville Station. Pockets of West Footscray and even Seddon are closer to McIvor Reserve than significant parts of what comes under Yarraville 3013. Maribyrnong is a small LGA. Weighting input in simple terms of resident’s suburb doesn’t seem to accurately reflect who is local.
The community engagement team
Hi RosG,
We understand that McIvor Reserve is used by many residents outside the suburb of Yarraville and some residents like your family live closer to the Reserve in suburbs such as Kingsville. We wish to reiterate that all feedback is considered equally. Specific data on how the park is used, where people travel from and what people like about the park allows us to gain a better understanding of community views and values regarding the Reserve.
Shari Liby asked | Question asked to The community engagement team
The survey was pushed by stadium advocates to their membership outside the community, Yarraville & Maribyrnong to people not using McIvor Reserve. If I'm a basketball player who has been asked by my club to respond in favour of the stadium but I don’t live in Yville and don’t use the Reserve, how was I to answer Q14?Do you agree there is no way such a respondent could have honestly answered Q14 &that survey can’t identify respondents with no interest in McIvor other than as a stadium location?
The community engagement team
Hi Shari,
The survey sought to capture initial feedback from users of the reserve, residents, neighbours and the broader community who might benefit from an indoor sports facility. The survey was free to be shared amongst community groups with different opinions, this includes those supportive of an indoor sports facility and those who might be opposed.
Shari Liby asked | Question asked to The community engagement team
Dc3 asked if Council will commit to sharing the “full suite” of 1000 responses received since it contains no personally identifiable information. You responded that, once you’ve analysed the data, “we will be able to provide a comprehensive overview of what we have heard - that will consider quantum, demographics, and the key themes informed by the totality of the feedback.” Dc3 clearly asked for the “full suite” of all 1000 responses. Please respond and provide your reasons.
The community engagement team
Hi Shari,
As per the reply to Dc3, Council will provide a comprehensive overview of what we heard - that will consider quantum, demographics and the key themes informed by the totality of the feedback. This is consistent across all our engagement projects.
Shari Liby asked | Question asked to The community engagement team
You told MPG "13% of those who responded to the questionnaire specifically identified as dog owners, which is also around 10% of the total number of registered dog owners in Yarraville." What do you mean by "specifically identified as dog owners"? Q14 of the online survey asking you to mark all that applied, didn't work so you could only mark one space, requiring responders to choose between neighbour, resident, sporting club user, dog walker, etc. How will this impact results?
The community engagement team
Hi Shari,
We are aware this question asked respondents to ‘select all that apply’ when only one option could be selected. As such, our answer to MPG should have been ‘at least 13% of those who responded identified as dog owners’ as respondents selected the option they most identified with. We don’t know what you are asking re how will this impact results? The results are the results which we are analysing and will share in due course.
Shari Liby asked | Question asked to The community engagement team
I noted it was clear conversations with sports clubs took place BEFORE the survey and asked “When did those earlier meetings occur? Are there minutes of those consultations? What was asked and what responses were received? Why were unstructured users not included?” You have responded but have not directly answered any of these questions. If only 17% of the survey responses were players of structured sport, why are they so heavily favoured in the budget and the formulation of survey questions?
The community engagement team
Hi Shari,
As per our previous responses, conversations with sports clubs, who are tenants at the Reserve, are undertaken on a regular basis and canvass many and varied matters.
As existing users these clubs have been consulted about the future upgrades and improvements they would like to see in the reserve as part of the masterplan process. Local residents, dog park users and casual users of the reserve have also had the opportunity to provide their input about the improvements they would like to see in the reserve as part of the masterplan process as well.
As has also previously been communicated to you, the same questions have been asked of everybody. No one has been favoured.
Shari Liby asked | Question asked to The community engagement team
I noted that Martha, at the community clearly stated that the survey results would be weighted to consider local community feedback more heavily than feedback from others and asked why we were told that if it was not true. You have responded with flowery language but failed to tell me why we were misled at the meeting. When was the decision to consider all feedback equally made? Before or after Martha advised us as she did? Who made that decision?
The community engagement team
Hi Shari,
All feedback is considered equally when it is submitted. By reviewing what we hear with an unbiased lens we get to understand the views of the community generally. The ability to filter the feedback by audience type also provides a greater level of detail that might identify differences between stakeholder groups when undertaking the analysis of the feedback received. This helps us understand the things that matter most to these different audiences, as well as the community at large and is an important consideration when framing the draft masterplan. I can assure you that your input as a local resident will be considered accordingly in that process.
Shari Liby asked | Question asked to The community engagement team
I asked you, "What level of detail from that data are you planning to share? Will you show the difference between local sentiment vs broader Maribyrnong sentiment vs broader Melbourne sentiment, for example?" You responded but did not did actually answer what was asked. I appreciate what you should be able to provide. I am asking whether you will commit to actually providing it. Please respond directly to my original query.
The community engagement team
Hi Shari,
We have responded directly to your original query. We will share what we have heard. We cannot commit to "showing the difference between local sentiment vs broader Maribyrnong sentiment vs broader Melbourne sentiment, for example" when we do not yet know if there is a difference. We are still analysing the data.